Taft v. Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
This case involves a builder of a Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal who allegedly diverted flood rainwater onto the real property of Darrell and Deryll Taft, John B. Fowler, and Jack Compton Development (appellants).
Taft, Fowler and Compton appeal from summary judgment in favor of Ball, Ball and Brosamer (BB & B), the builder, on the issues of strict liability, trespass, negligence and causation. We hold that summary judgment on the issues of strict liability and trespass was proper, but reverse the judgment on the issues of negligence and causation.
PACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Tribe v. Shell Oil Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Boozer v. Arizona Country ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Salladay v. Old Dominion Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Bledsoe v. GoodfarbArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- South West Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Central Arizona Water Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.