Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Proctor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 46PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a jury and found guilty on three separate counts of unlawful delivery of controlled substances (heroin and cocaine). Post-trial motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to three concurrent prison terms of not fewer than five nor more than fifteen years. This appeal followed.

The Commonwealth’s case was presented essentially through the testimony of Brenda Townes, an undercover agent for the Pennsylvania Bureau of Drug Control. Ms. Townes testified that on three occasions during the period of January 21, 1975 through February 21, 1975, she — with the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. GadwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. CanalesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Moncrief v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. GenteelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. LambSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Solomon v. BaumCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API