Hale v. Messineo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Because the statements made by the defendant in her complaint to the New York City Police Department Civilian Complaint Review Board are protected by an absolute privilege (see, Magnus v Anpatiellos, 130 AD2d 719), the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs request for disclosure of these statements (see, Cirale v 80 Pine St. Corp., 35 NY2d 113, 117; Matter of Weinberg, 129 AD2d 126; Hoffman v Ro-San Manor, 73 AD2d 207). Weinstein, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cirale v. 80 Pine Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Hoffman v. Ro-San ManorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Magnus v. AnpatiellosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987