Shepard v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY I. EAGER, Special Commissioner.
This appeal arises out of a claim against the Second Injury Fund for Workmen’s Compensation benefits. The claimant lost and has appealed. We shall need to state the facts in some detail. We have jurisdiction because the State Treasurer is a party.
Claimant was an automobile mechanic. He worked for White Motor Company in Kansas City for about eight or nine years; in the fall of 1963 he was first employed by Rudy Fick, Inc., the employer in the present controversy. There he worked in a large second floor room 70-80 feet long and 30-50 feet wide, as thus…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Gott v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- McKay v. Delico Meat Products Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. Research Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Webb v. Norbert Markway Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Wells v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Griffin v. Evans Electrical Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Lindquist v. Container Corp. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.