Legal Opinion

Devendorf v. Akbar Petroleum Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1989No. 13800PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baird, Judge.

This cause came before the court upon the appeal of David S. and Joan Devendorf from the portion of the trial court’s order refusing to enjoin the use of an area which included five lots subject to restrictive covenants for the purpose of establishing the minimum acreage requirements for oil well drilling.

David and Joan Devendorf own a tract of land situated in Lot 54 of Bath Township. Their land is part of a forty-acre unplatted residential tract which was originally conveyed as a single parcel in a 1949 deed. This deed contained the following language:

“ * * * [A]s a part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yeager v. CassidyScioto County Court of Common Pleas · 1969
  2. Ritzenthaler v. PepasOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DeRosa v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Catawba Orchard Beach Assn. v. BasingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Brooks v. OrshoskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Ellis v. Patonai, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. DeRosa v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API