Legal Opinion

Mard v. Town of Amherst

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 20, 2003No. 03-1216PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

In her action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff Veronica Mard appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of defendants Town of Amherst et al. Mard complains that the defendants terminated her injury leave benefits without providing adequate notice or opportunity to be heard, in violation of her right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment. Finding compliance with the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Perez Acevedo v. Rivero CubanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Hadfield v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. San Gerónimo Caribe Project, Inc. v. Acevedo-ViláCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. Jones v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  5. Chmielinski v. MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API