Legal Opinion

Harman v. Walsh

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1951No. Civ. 17708PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The action herein was instituted by the plaintiffs as purchasers under a contract for the sale of real estate, furniture and furnishings. Claiming an unlawful forfeiture by defendant sellers, the complaint seeks specific performance and damages. The defendants filed a cross- complaint to quiet title. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendants upon findings that the plaintiffs were in default in making payments, that such default had not been waived, that notice of forfeiture had been given. The trial court concluded that under the contract terms the defendants were entitled to retain as…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Fowler v. COURTEMANCHEOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Zerkel v. LindseyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Smith v. RenzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Zerkel v. LindseyOregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API