Legal Opinion
Groppo v. Courier Corp.
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided May 21, 1998No. 950383BPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKottmyer, J.
INTRODUCTION
In her Second Amended Complaint (“the Complaint”), plaintiff, Margaret Groppo (“Groppo”) seeks damages from her former employer Courier Corporation (“Courier”) and three Courier executives James F. Conway, III, Thomas Osenton and Diana Sawyer (collectively “the Individual Defendants”). Groppo alleges that Courier enticed her to leave her former job by *567promising her employment for an annual term, that she would be head of an independent division with profit and loss responsibility and that she would not report to the Sales and Marketing Division. On July 23, 1996, Count II…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jackson v. Action for Boston Community Development, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Matthews v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Zimmerman v. KentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- MacCormack v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lorenc v. Be Free, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003