Puckett Wear v. City of Ft. Worth
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Puckett Wear constructed a sidewalk and curb adjacent to property owned by Bishop Birchfield in the city of Ft. Worth under a contract with the owners to be paid for such work. They instituted this suit against the city for damages in the sum of $129.60 as the extra cost of tearing out and replacing the sidewalk and curbing, which, according to allegations in their petition, they originally completed in accordance with the negligent directions of the city engineer, who thereafter required them to remove it; and proof was introduced by plaintiffs sufficient to sustain those allegations. But,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- City of Fort Worth v. SheroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Mayor, Aldermen & Inhabitants of Houston v. IsaacksTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- English v. City of Ft. WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Parsons v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hallman v. City of PampaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- City of Beaumont v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Stinson v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- McLendon v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953