Legal Opinion

Sea-Air Handling Services, Inc. v. Reed

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1998No. CC 9609-06691; SC S44721PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

This is an original action in mandamus. ORS 34.120. Bankruptcy trustee Hartvig (relator) contends that Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge Marshall Arniton exceeded his authority under ORCP 71 C in granting plaintiff-adverse party Sea-Air Handling Services, Inc.’s (Sea-Air) requested relief and that Judge Arniton misinterpreted the “second dismissal rule” in ORCP 54 Ail). 1 Consequently, he asks this court to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus directing Judge Arniton to reverse his November 13,1997, order granting Sea-Air’s motion for entry of a supplemental judgment of dismissal “without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Van Natta v. Columbia CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SteffensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API