Legal Opinion

People v. Samuels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Friedman, J.

In People v Mike (92 NY2d 996), the Court of Appeals held that a conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance premised upon an “offering for sale” theory (see, Penal Law § 220.00 [1]) must be supported by evidence of a bona fide offer to sell, which means that the evidence must show that the defendant had both the intent and the ability to proceed with the sale. In this criminal action, defendants, pointing to Mike, assert that the evidence supporting their convictions was insufficient because no drugs were recovered by the police upon their arrest.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. GuidiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. People v. LaddNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. MikeNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. MullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. ForgioneNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Pitter v. FischerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. In re Kariem L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API