Raibley v. Marvin E. Kanze, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the court below to take off a nonsuit entered after a determination that the evidence presented was insufficient to establish a cause of action. The sole question before us is whether the entry of the compulsory nonsuit was proper.
On September 27, 1968 plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant for replacement of an oil heating system in her home with a gas heating and air-conditioning system. Pursuant to the contract, defendant on October 25, 1968 arrived at plaintiff’s house to commence the work estimated to take several days…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Laubach v. HaighSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Lear v. Shirk's Motor Express Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- McElhinny v. IliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKenzie v. Cost Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. StantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Arcidiacono v. Timeless Towns of the Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- McKenzie v. Cost Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978