Legal Opinion

Raibley v. Marvin E. Kanze, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1972No. Appeal, 1417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the court below to take off a nonsuit entered after a determination that the evidence presented was insufficient to establish a cause of action. The sole question before us is whether the entry of the compulsory nonsuit was proper.

On September 27, 1968 plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant for replacement of an oil heating system in her home with a gas heating and air-conditioning system. Pursuant to the contract, defendant on October 25, 1968 arrived at plaintiff’s house to commence the work estimated to take several days…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Laubach v. HaighSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Lear v. Shirk's Motor Express Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. McElhinny v. IliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. Cost Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. StantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Arcidiacono v. Timeless Towns of the Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. McKenzie v. Cost Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API