Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Custer County
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
In 1932' the plaintiff duly listed all of its property in Custer county for assessment and therein included the item “Power Plant, Machinery and Boilers” of the estimated value of $65,000. The assessor classified this property as falling within “class 4” of section 1999, Revised Codes of 1921, which fixed its “taxable value” at 30 per cent, of its actual value.
Contending that this property properly falls within class 2, which would render it taxable at 20 per cent, of its actual value, the plaintiff exhausted its statutory remedies, paid the first half of the 1932 taxes under protest, and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Beggs v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sanders CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- People Ex Rel. Brush Electric Manufacturing Co. v. WempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In re Hudson River Electric Power Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Curry v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Department of Revenue v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- McDonald's Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Winterfield v. Hardin County Rural Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Wheir v. DyeMontana Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.