Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Conservatorship of Goodman

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1988No. 68194Published

1DissentMacGUIGAN, Judge

Being mindful of the long-standing admonition for courts to refrain from passing on the constitutionality of a statute unless absolutely necessary, Smith v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 732 P.2d 466 (Okl.1987), I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion’s holding that our statute allowing for the appointment of a conservator is unconstitutional.

The authority for appointment of a conservator in this jurisdiction is strictly statutory. 58 O.S.1981 § 890.1 enumerates the requirements for notice and hearing of petition for appointment of conservator, and § 890.2 provides that, after such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Kimery v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. In Re Mayes-Rogers Counties Conservancy Dist. FormationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Todd v. Oklahoma State Democratic Central CommitteeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Matter of Conservatorship of SpindleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API