Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. La Salle Ambulance Service, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 6, 1982No. 81-1495PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

Plaintiff brought a negligence action against La Salle Ambulance Service, Inc., later amending her complaint to add another negligence count (count II) against Dr. Mitchell Sheinkop, her treating physician. Dr. Sheinkop moved to dismiss count II because the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The court granted Sheinkop’s motion and dismissed count II. Plaintiff appeals.

The sole issue raised on appeal is whether count II sufficiently alleged fraudulent concealment within the meaning of section 22 of the Limitations Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 83, par. 23) to toll the statute of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Zagar v. Health & Hospitals Governing CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Guebard v. JabaayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Urchel v. Holy Cross HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of Chicago HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Sattler v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Melko v. DionisioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Tucek v. GrantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Woods v. SchmittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API