Legal Opinion

Electronic Instruments for Research, Inc. v. Georgetown University

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1966No. 3861PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, an electronics firm, sued Georgetown University for the purchase price of a gas chromatograph with related equipment.1 The University admitted it ordered the instrument but contended that the instrument received did not conform to the one ordered. The University’s chief complaint was that the instrument supplied did not have a transistorized power supply. Plaintiff’s position was that the purchase order did not specify such a power supply.

The purchase order called for an “AU-8 EIR CHROMATOGRAPH”, and specified neither a transistorized circuit nor a tube-type…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dixon v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. District of Columbia v. Northeastern Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  3. Loonsk Bros. v. Sinclair Motor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Modern Electric, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ideal Electronic Security Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API