Electronic Instruments for Research, Inc. v. Georgetown University
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, an electronics firm, sued Georgetown University for the purchase price of a gas chromatograph with related equipment.1 The University admitted it ordered the instrument but contended that the instrument received did not conform to the one ordered. The University’s chief complaint was that the instrument supplied did not have a transistorized power supply. Plaintiff’s position was that the purchase order did not specify such a power supply.
The purchase order called for an “AU-8 EIR CHROMATOGRAPH”, and specified neither a transistorized circuit nor a tube-type…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dixon v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- District of Columbia v. Northeastern Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Loonsk Bros. v. Sinclair Motor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States of America Ex Rel. Modern Electric, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ideal Electronic Security Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996