Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Mulinos of Westchester, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 2010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages pursuant to General Obligations Law § 11-101, the defendants Mulinos of West-chester, Inc., Louis Gigante, Sr., Louis Gigante, Jr., Jimmy Cavagna, Louis Pipolo, and Ha Rugova appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J), entered September 24, 2009, as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages for alleged violations of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 and General Obligations Law § 11-101 insofar as asserted against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Romano v. StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Adamy v. ZiriakusNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Adamy v. ZiriakusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Valicenti v. ValenzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parslow v. LeakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Pinilla v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Trigoso v. CorreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Dugan v. OlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Conklin v. TraversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API