Legal Opinion

Kunzie v. Jack-In-The-Box, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2010No. ED 92974PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Presiding Judge.

Introduction

David Kunzie (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside arbitration proceedings on the basis that the trial court erred in finding that a validly formed arbitration agreement existed between Appellant and his former employer, Jack-in-the Box, Inc. (Respondent). We find that Appellant’s continued employment alone did not objectively manifest his intent to be bound to Respondent’s proposed arbitration policy. Thus, we reverse the judgment and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine if additional facts exist…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Johnson v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Nitro Distributing, Inc. v. DunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Jennifer Shockley v. PrimeLendingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Baier v. Darden RestaurantsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Katz v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Kathryn Jimenez, Petitioner/Respondent v. Cintas CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Jennings v. SSM Health Care St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API