Pratt v. State Tax Commission
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Justice.
This personal income tax case requires us to examine the elements that must be satisfied to effect a change in domicile.
I
BACKGROUND
The parties have stipulated to the following pertinent facts. From July of 1987 until sometime in 1991, the appellants, William and Joy Pratt, were domiciled in the state of Idaho. Mr. Pratt was employed by a bank in Boise, Idaho until May 3, 1991, when his employment was terminated. On that date he received a termination check in the amount of $63,450.
The Pratts had intended to move to Clark-ston, Washington following Mr. Pratt’s re tirement. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Bogner v. State Dept. of Revenue and Tax.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Kelly v. KellyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- O'Holleran v. O'HolleranIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Sankey v. IveyIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Beebe v. North Idaho Day Surgery, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.