Legal Opinion

State of Missouri v. Bruce Pierce

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 24, 2014No. SC93321PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL C. WILSON, Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether the trial court can refuse to give a lesser included offense instruction requested by the defendant under section 556.046 when the lesser offense consists of a subset of the elements of the charged offense and the differential element (i.e., the element required for the charged offense but not for the lesser offense) is one on which the state bears the burden of proof. The answer, unequivocally, is no.

Here, a jury found Denford Jackson guilty of robbery in the first degree. The trial court declined to instruct the jury on…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Blaec James LammersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. State of Missouri v. Robert Blake BlurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. G. Steven Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  5. State of Missouri v. Denford JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API