Legal Opinion

United States v. Norman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 2015No. Criminal Action Nos. 14-412-05, 14-412-06PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

In July 2014, six then-Philadelphia police officers were indicted with charges of conspiracy under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and various related offenses. In preparation for trial, two of the defendants — John Speiser and Linwood Norman — have moved to quash several counts of the indictment, and Speiser has moved for a bill of particulars. Because (1) a pretrial motion is an impermissible vehicle under the circumstances here for challenging the sufficiency of the Government’s evidence; (2) the indictment…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ravneet SinghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Ravneet SinghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API