Legal Opinion

Turbeville v. McCarrell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1934No. Civil No. 3349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This appeal is taken from a default judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order after judgment refusing to grant defendant’s motion to vacate judgment. We shall refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant, it being understood that plaintiff is the appellee. The nature of the question is such as to require a pretty complete history of the court proceedings below.

The case was commenced in Apache county on June 9, 1927, on plaintiff’s complaint against defendant Turbeville for money had and received. A writ of attachment was sued out and levied upon said defendant’s livestock, defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Baird v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Missoula Belt Line Ry. Co. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Cuddahy v. GraggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Gutierrez v. RomeroArizona Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phoenix Metals Corporation v. RothArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. The W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. SpencerArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. McCarrell v. TurbevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API