Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Himmel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 1919PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Ambler, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore instituted proceedings for the condemnation in fee of eleven pieces of property for use in connection with the establishment by the City of a Civic Centre. A portion of the property was subject to ground rent. By their inquisition the jury found that the damages which would be sustained by the owners of the entire property by the taking, use and occupation by the City to be $283,500.00. The value of the ground rents (which was fixed by agreement and about which there is no question in this ease) was found to be $15,230.00. The balance, $268,270.00, was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Acquiring Title by City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Patch v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Swan v. County of MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. HurlockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. St. Louis, Oak Hill & Carondelet Railway Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Becktold Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  2. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hance v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Bergeman v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API