Legal Opinion

Beyer v. Anchor Insulation Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 17, 2017No. Civil No. 3:13-cv-1576 (JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge.

Defendant Anchor Insulation Co. (“Anchor” or “Defendant”) moves [Doc. # 189] for summary judgment on all remaining counts in this product liability action involving Defendant’s installation of spray polyurethane foam insulation (“SPF”) in the home of the Plaintiffs Richard and Monica Beyer (“Plaintiffs” or the “Bey-ers”), arguing that Plaintiffs cannot establish product defect or causation absent expert testimony that must be precluded as argued in Defendant’s three separate Dau-bert motions…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Holcomb v. Iona CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Byrd v. Janssen Pharm., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2018
  3. Coning v. Bayer Pharma AG (PLR1)District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  4. Senchyshyn v. BIC Sport North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API