Legal Opinion

Long Island Railroad v. Carfloats New York Central No. 25

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 25, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This is a libel in personam against the New York Central Railroad (Central) and in rem against Central Carfioats Nos. 66 and 25, brought by the Long Island Railroad (Long Island) for collision damage to its tug Patchogue. The respondent impleaded the Lehigh Valley Railroad (Lehigh) pursuant to Admiralty Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. The jurisdiction of this court and the ownership of the various vessels is admitted. The facts are as follows.

On December 18,1953, the Long Island tug Patchogue was properly moored port side to a wharf at Long Island City known as the “Oil…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. The LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. The BarnstableSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Strika v. Netherlands Ministry of Traffic, Directorate General of ShippingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. Redman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caemint Food, Inc. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, Companhia De NavegacaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Watz v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. South, Inc. v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. Caemint Food, Inc. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, Companhia De NavegacaoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API