Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ries v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1943No. 29381Published

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The relator bases his claim for relief solely on the ground that the Industrial Commission which is respondent here, in its consideration of his c]aim for compensation, abused its discretion in .failing to follow the recommendation of its inspector in fixing the average weekly wage at $21.60. Por that reason he claims to be entitled to a peremptory writ requiring the commission to fix such average weekly wage at $21.60 instead of $14.28.

The relator, to be entitled to the writ, must show that he has a clear legal right to have his average weekly wage fixed at $21.60, and that the respondent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API