Legal Opinion

Bethel Inv. Co. v. City of Hampton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 3, 2006No. Record 060043PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Senior Justice CHARLESS. RUSSELL.

This appeal requires us to consider whether a party to litigation in which the statute of limitations is at issue is entitled to a jury trial upon the preliminary issue of fact as to when the statute began to run.

Facts and Proceedings

In the mid-1990's, the City of Hampton (the City) made plans for the development of a 470-acre industrial and commercial park as an enhancement to its tax base. A part of this plan entailed filling in an area then classified as wetlands by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps). The City and the Corps entered into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Speet v. BacajSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. Stanardsville Volunteer Fire Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SaltzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. LeakeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. VanMarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  2. Isbell v. Commercial Inv. Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  3. Jackson v. HartigSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. William Scott Ingram v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  5. Holmes v. ReidNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API