Legal Opinion

Purdie v. Stephenville, N. & S. T. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Comanche County; J. H. Arnold, Judge. Action by E. C. Purdie and wife against the Stephenville, North & South Texas Railway Company. From an order dissolving in part a restraining order, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

E. C. Purdie and wife obtained an order from the district judge in vacation, restraining the Stephenville, North & South Texas Railway Company, a railway corporation, from appropriating to its own use a strip of land 250 feet wide across a tract owned and occupied by the complainants as their homestead. Thereafter the respondents procured a dissolution in part of the restraining order, so that the same was not operative as to a strip 100 feet wide, being 50 feet on either side of the company’s proposed line of road. From this latter order, the complainants have appealed.

[1] It is first urged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Randall v. Texas Central R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southwest Nat. Bank of Dallas v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Denton County v. SaulsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Downey v. DowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Southwest Nat. Bank of Dallas v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API