Legal Opinion
Mutter v. Doyle
Superior Court of Rhode Island
Decided September 3, 2008No. C.A. Nos. 99-5123, 04-0589Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
Before this Court is a consolidated dispute concerning a decision of the Pawtucket City Council which denied Plaintiff Eric Mutter's (Plaintiff or Mutter) application for disability pension benefits.1 Through his Complaint, the Plaintiff sought declaratory relief regarding his rights under the City's ordinance, an injunction compelling the City to follow its ordinance relating to disability pensions, and a writ of mandamus demanding the City award him disability pension benefits. Jurisdiction is pursuant to G.L. 1956 §§ 8-2-13 and 8-2-16 and G.L. 1956 § 9-30-1 et seq.
I
Facts Travel
This…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Recupero v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Bard v. Boston Shipping Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Hood v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.