Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 2015No. 3D15-242Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See State v. Calloway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995), receded from in part on other grounds in Dixon v. State, 730 So.2d 265 (Fla.1999), (holding that a post-conviction motion, alleging trial court improperly imposed consecutive enhanced sentences for crimes arising from a single criminal episode, must be timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 (rather than rule 3.800), where the resolution of the motion requires factual determinations and cannot be determined upon the face of the record). See also Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002); Flores v. State, 745…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Flores v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API