Kindel v. Hall
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.
Kindel and Stewart, the appellants, as copartners, manufactured mattresses in the city of Denver, in 1886. The business required the operation of a machinery plant, and the firm put into its factory a couple of boilers and an engine for manufacturing purposes. A description of the building *64and its surroundings is unimportant. It is enough to say the firm employed Thomas Hicks as an engineer. lie had been doing that work for some months prior to the accident. The appellee, Hall, was running the pickers in a part of the building some six or seven feet away from the boilers and in the main…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perot v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Potter v. C., R. I. &. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Denver, S. P. & P. R. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Hoffman v. ParryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
- Anson v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kanotex Refining Co. v. BonifieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919