Plov v. Bayless

Plaintiff appeals from a verdict and judgment for fendants following trial of his damage action for irsonal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle acci-nt.

Plaintiff makes the following assignments of error:

1) Failure to give the uniform jury instruction1 garding the right of every person to assume that the rw will be obeyed;

2) Refusal to admit proffered expert testimony of 70 witnesses, Leonard Schultz and James Isaac.

The essential facts are:

The accident occurred during daylight hours at a ’ intersection in Clackamas County, being the inter-ction of Highway 224, an arterial highway, and ikers…