Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Davis

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1950No. 37442PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Bill was filed by Hunt to remove certain alleged clouds upon his title to one-half the minerals under the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 9 North, Eange 9 West. These clouds consist of a mineral deed from Davis to Clark and a mineral lease from Clark ■and Davis to Eeynolds and Wedemeyer. The answer included a cross-bill by the defendants to cancel the title of’Hunt to one-fourth the minerals. The chancellor entered’ a decree dismissing thé cross-bill and awarding re lief to Hunt. A rehearing was later held- under amended pleadings stressing the allegation of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Koenig v. Calcote Et Ux.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Terre Haute Cooperage, Inc. v. BranscomeMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Alliance Tr. Co., Ltd. v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Butterfield Lumber Co. v. GuyMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  5. McCubbins v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rotenberry v. HookerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mid-Continent Telephone Corp. v. Home Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
  3. York v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1984
  4. Johnson v. Consolidated American Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Mississippi State Bldg. Com'n v. Becknell Const. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API