Legal Opinion
Makransky v. Long Island Reo Truck Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John P. Cohalan, Jr., J.
Plaintiff seeks a partial summary judgment against the defendants, Tinker National Bank and Charles Falkner, and for an order directing assessment of damages. Said defendants by cross motion seek summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them. The cross motion is denied. The motion of the plaintiff for partial summary judgment is granted.
Defendant, Thomas Vincel as president of the Long Island Reo Truck Co. Inc. (Truck Company), on August 15, 1966 entered into a security sales agreement involving a Reo Diesel tractor, with a subsidiary corporation known as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sterling Acceptance Co. v. GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Weisel v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Gricar v. Bairhalter, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- Newton-Waltham Bank & Trust Co. v. Bergen Motors, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971
- Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Smith Boys, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1985
- Spungin v. Chinetti International MotorsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981