Legal Opinion

Weisel v. McBride

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1959No. Appeal, 101PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The plaintiff on June 6, 1957 bought a Studebaker Station Wagon from the defendant, James McBride trading as McBride Motor Sales, who at the time was an authorized distributor or dealer for Studebaker cars. He paid this defendant the sale price in full, including the Pennsylvania Sales Tax and the fee for registration of title in his name. Thereupon, on the above date, possession of the automobile was given to the plaintiff and he then signed an application for title to the car in his name and delivered the application to McBride for forwarding to the proper authorities.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. CiriglianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Franklin Investment Co. v. HomburgDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Sterling Acceptance Co. v. GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. 1ST NAT. BK. of MILLVILLE v. HorwattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Correria v. Orlando Bank & Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. Finance America Commercial Corp. v. Econo Coach, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API