Legal Opinion

United States v. Lanier

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 16, 2008No. 06-4574UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendant William Lanier appeals an order of the district court denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a protective sweep of a residence pursuant to an arrest warrant. In denying the motion, the district court found credible the unrebutted testimony of the police officers. Lanier appeals, arguing that the district court’s findings of fact were clearly erroneous. Because we conclude that the district court’s factual determinations were not clearly erroneous, we affirm.

I

On the morning of July 12, 2005, a detachment of the Cleveland, Ohio Police Department’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. Reymundo GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Alfredo Rodriguez-SuazoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  2. United States v. WeeksDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  3. United States v. DeAngelo VanhookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Tyrone CammonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API