Tea v. Strom

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Joseph Gerace, J.), entered December 2, 2002. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ motion in *1033part, dismissed the fourth cause of action and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for admission of their son pro hac vice to serve as co-counsel.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the cross motion and as modified the order is affirmed with costs to plaintiffs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying the cross…