Legal Opinion

White v. Wadhams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1919No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Brown, J. Bill by Marl S. White against Frederick N. Wad-hams and others for an accounting. From an order denying a motion to dismiss, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The plaintiff, Marl S. White, filed his bill in the Kent circuit court for a partnership accounting against defendant Frederick N. Wadhams. The Hastings City Bank was also made defendant upon the theory that the partnership funds were deposited with it. Injunction was granted to prevent the disposition of the partnership funds by Wadhams, or payment of them by the bank. Upon the hearing of the case it developed that defendant Wadhams had taken a certificate of deposit for such funds and had transferred the same to his sister Ida E. Wadhams, who had cashed it at the State Savings Bank of Ann…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HursonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. White v. WadhamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woodliff v. Citizens Building & Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Horvath v. VasvaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lyson v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API