Legal Opinion

Rummel v. Yazoo Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 23, 1991No. 1—90—2632PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE CERDA

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, John Lee Rummel, filed a products liability action against defendant, Yazoo Manufacturing Company, a corporation, in connection with injuries allegedly received from a lawn mower. Defendant appeals from dismissal of its third.-party complaint for contribution against plaintiff’s employer, Grayslake Community High School District No. 127. Defendant argues that: (1) the statute of limitations for actions against municipalities did not bar its contribution action against third-party defendant; and (2) third-party defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rakowski v. LucenteIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Stephens v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Morris v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Caballero v. Rockford Punch Press & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Carlson v. MOLINE BD. OF EDUC. SCH. DIST. NO. 40Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Rummel v. Yazoo Mfg. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Carlson v. Moline Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Patsis v. Zion-Benton Township High School, No. 126Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API