Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Lantrip

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1934No. 6 Div. 518PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The action was originally brought against Robert F. Jennings and Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, claiming damages by reason of an assault and battery committed by Jennings on plaintiff at a time when Jennings was in the employ of defendant and while acting within the line and scope of his employment. The complaint was amended by striking out Jennings as a party defendant and by adding counts A, B, and C. The plea of defendant was in short by consent the general issue, with lieve, etc.

It is without dispute that at the time of the alleged assault Jennings was employed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hardeman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HillAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Barker v. Dairymen's Milk Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Green Cove Springs v. Yvonne DonaldsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Doe v. SwiftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Hendley v. Springhill Memorial Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Patterson v. Augat Wiring Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
  5. EAST ALA. BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE v. ChanceySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API