Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ribelino Avendano v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 27, 2014No. 13-2171Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKelly, Circuit Judge

I concur in Part II.B. of the court’s opinion. With respect to the court’s conclusion that “the Board permissibly categorized Avendano’s offense of making terroristic threats in Minnesota as a crime involving moral turpitude,” as addressed in Part U.A., I respectfully dissent.

Ribelino Avendano pleaded guilty to one count of making terroristic threats in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.713 subd. 1. This statute provides two mental states by which the statute may be violated: “Whoever threatens, directly or indirectly, to commit any crime of violence with purpose to terrorize another ... or in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. SILVA-TREVINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Keo Chanmouny v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. Bobadilla v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API