Kimberly Corp. v. Hartley Pen Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
This suit was originally instituted in 1953 by appellee-plaintiff, Hartley Pen Company, (hereafter called Hartley). In this action defendant-appellee, Lindy Pen Company, (hereafter called Lindy) was charged with infringement of Letters Patent No. 2,498,009 owned by Hartley.1
Later, and on or about January 15, 1954, appellant Kimberly Corporation, (hereafter called Kimberly) filed a motion to intervene as a plaintiff in the pending Hartley action upon the ground that it was the full equitable owner of the patent in suit, and as such, had an interest in the Hartley patent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gillons v. Shell Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Morales v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Westfall Larson & Co. v. All-Man-Hubble Tug Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Vincent I. Whitman v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc., a Corporation Walter E. Disney, an Individual John Doe OneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- General Bedding Corporation v. Angel Echevarria, Angel Echevarria Co., Inc., D/B/A Somma Mattress, and Frederick BrandauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Naxon Telesign Corporation v. Bunker Ramo Corporation, Stewart-Warner Corporation, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- M & T Chemicals, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.