Legal Opinion

Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1986No. 77470, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The no-fault automobile liability act 1 provides that an insurer shall pay personal protection insurance (no-fault) benefits to "the person named in the policy, the person’s spouse, and a relative of either domiciled in the same household . . . It is further provided that when benefits are payable by the injured person’s insurer and would also be payable under the policy of the person’s spouse or a relative, the injured person’s insurer shall pay all the benefits and "shall not be entitled to recoupment 2 from the other insurer.” 3

The act does not, however, expressly provide whether, when an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Martin v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Attorney General v. Lake States Wood Preserving, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Fox & Associates, Inc v. Hayes TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. DAIIE v. Home Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Farmers Insurance Group v. LynchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API