Legal Opinion

Paoli v. California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1956No. Civ. 16720PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff Paoli and others, on behalf of Sugar Refinery Employees’ Union, Crockett Local 20037, A. F. of L. (the collective bargaining representative), seeking damages and injunctive relief, sued defendant alleging a breach by defendant of a collective bargaining contract and of an arbitration award rendered thereunder. The trial court rendered judgment denying damages 1 but granting injunctive relief. Defendant appeals.

The relief granted was a declaration that defendant had breached the contract and the award and ‘ ‘ That the plaintiffs are hereby entitled to injunctive relief to prevent the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 904California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Foster v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Gregory v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Teachers Management & Investment Corp. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Grier v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Guardianship of Baby Boy M.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Early v. Santa Clara Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Lavallee v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API