Legal Opinion

Barker v. Heekin Can Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1991PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the trial court properly ordered summary judgment in favor of defendant Heekin Can Company, apparently on the basis of a defect in service of process. Because of imprecision in defense pleading and lack of specificity in the final judgment, we are unable to discern the exact reason for dismissal of the action, but whatever the ground, procedural or substantive, we conclude that summary judgment was inappropriate and remand the case for trial or other disposition on the merits.

This lawsuit was filed as a workers’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goss v. HutchinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Garland v. Seaboard Coastline RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Frontier Community Credit UnionTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hall v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Watson v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Young ex rel. estate of Young v. KennedyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Faulks v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API