Legal Opinion

Hogue v. American Steel Foundries

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1915No. Appeal, No. 50PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal, No. 50, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1912, No. 60, for defendant on demurrer to plaintiff’s statement of claim in case of W. T. Hogue and R. F. Hogue, trading as Hogue Brothers & Company, v. American Steel Foundries, a corporation. Assumpsit to recover amount equivalent to dividends on preferred stock. Before Cohen, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 50, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1912, No. 60, for defendant on demurrer to plaintiff’s statement of claim in case of W. T. Hogue and R. F. Hogue, trading as Hogue Brothers & Company, v. American Steel Foundries, a corporation. Assumpsit to recover amount equivalent to dividends on preferred stock. Before Cohen, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. The court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ statement of claim, and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was the judgment of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

From their original statement of claim filed in this case, in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, it appears that plaintiffs sought to recover from the defendant, the amount of the par value of certain shares of preferred stock held by them in the defendant company. They also claimed that they were entitled to an amount which should properly have been declared as dividends upon the stock. In an amended statement, filed more than eighteen months afterwards, the claim to the par value of the stock was abandoned, and the attempt to recover was limited to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North State Copper & Gold Mining Co. v. FieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  2. Kelly v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Madden v. Penn Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cunliffe v. Consumers Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Boyette v. Preston Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Thompson v. Southern Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API