Kase v. Bennett
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill to foreclose. On final hearing on bill, answer, replication and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Emery, V. C.
The bill in this case is filed to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendants to the complainant, on lands lying in the township of East Orange, Essex county, and the defence set up at the - hearing is usury.
It is insisted that the usurious nature of the transaction arises out of the terms and conditions of the bond and mortgage, and the provisions therein relating to taxes. The condition of the bond, after the provision for payment of certain sums of money, and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent., adds:
“together with all national, state, county and municipal taxes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Monmouth Park Ass'n v. Wallis Iron WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- New-Orleans Gas Light & Banking Co. v. DudleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Archibald v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- Merchants' Insurance v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldberg v. MacChiarelliNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932