Archibald v. Thomas
New York Supreme Court
Debt on bond. The defence was usury, apparent on the ^ace condition. The usury was pleaded in due form» The cause was tried at the Warren Circuit, Jiote \lth, 1822, before his Honor (the late) Mr. Justice Yates.
Read the full summary
Debt on bond. The defence was usury, apparent on the ^ace condition. The usury was pleaded in due form» The cause was tried at the Warren Circuit, Jiote \lth, 1822, before his Honor (the late) Mr. Justice Yates. (->n tbe tr'al> the execution of the bond was proved by one of the subscribing witnesses* ft was executed by the defendants, payable to the plaintiff, dated July 26th, 1815, and in the penalty of $6000. The condition was as fol-. '°ws : “ That if the above bounden Joshua Thomas and Aaron Varnumi their heirs, &c. shall well and truly pay or cause to be paid to the above named James…
1Opinion of the Court
Curia,
per Woodworth, J.
This is an application for q pew trial. The plaintiff commenced an action of debt on bond, dated 27th January, 1815, conditioned to pay $3000, with interest, as follows: $500, with interest on the whole sum, from the 1st day of October, 1815, on or before the 1st October, 1816; and $500 more thereof, with interest op the whole sum unpaid, from the 1st day of October, next, op or before the 1st October, 1817. The residue is payable in instalments of $500 yearly in like manner. ¡The case states, that the pleas, alleging the usury, adopted tl/e language of the condition of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Levy v. GadsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1805
3Cited by13 opinions
- M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Galveston & Houston Investment Co. v. GrymesTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Franklin Opera House Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
- Siter v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.