Legal Opinion

Dent v. Giaimo

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 20, 2009No. Case 08-81191-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

KENNETH L. RYSKAMP, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation [DE 69] of United States Magistrate Judge Ann E. Vitunac. Pending before Judge Vitunac was defendant’s Verified Motion for Attorney’s Fees [DE 47]. Plaintiff filed a response [DE 53], defendant filed a reply [DE 60], and Judge Vitunac held a hearing on the motion on July 23, 2009. In her report, Judge Vitunac recommends that this Court grant the defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees in the amount of $7,170 to be assessed against plaintiffs counsel,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Joseph Thorne v. All Restoration Svcs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valley v. Ocean Sky LimoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  2. Rodriguez v. Marble Care Int'l, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API