Dent v. Giaimo
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
KENNETH L. RYSKAMP, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation [DE 69] of United States Magistrate Judge Ann E. Vitunac. Pending before Judge Vitunac was defendant’s Verified Motion for Attorney’s Fees [DE 47]. Plaintiff filed a response [DE 53], defendant filed a reply [DE 60], and Judge Vitunac held a hearing on the motion on July 23, 2009. In her report, Judge Vitunac recommends that this Court grant the defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees in the amount of $7,170 to be assessed against plaintiffs counsel,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Joseph Thorne v. All Restoration Svcs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Valley v. Ocean Sky LimoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Rodriguez v. Marble Care Int'l, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012