Legal Opinion

Farris v. Denton

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 18, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.

This is a will case, tried in the Law Court at Bristol on the issue of devisavit vel non. All grounds of contest have now been abandoned except contestant’s claim that the instrument offered for probate as the will of Henry Denton is invalid because it is a joint will of Henry Denton and wife Bertie Denton which postpones vestiture of title until the death of the survivor.

It is the insistence of contestants that, under Richmond v. Richmond, 195 Tenn. 704, 227 S.W.(2d) 4, and McDaniel v. Owens, 39 Tenn.App. 73, 281 S.W.(2d) 259, hereinafter discussed, postponement of vestiture of title makes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Epperson v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Popejoy v. PetersTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McDaniel v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  4. Richmond v. RichmondTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Huffines v. MincheyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boucher v. BuffordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API